AFP/Abu Dhabi

A UAE court yesterday sentenced 69 Islamists to jail for up to 15 years on charges of plotting to overthrow the government, at the conclusion of a mass trial criticised by rights groups.

Amnesty International slammed the verdicts, saying the trial was “grossly unfair” and the charges were “bogus”.

The Federal Supreme Court sentenced 56 of the 94 defendants to 10 years in prison, the official Wam news agency said.

Among the 56 is Sheikh Sultan bin Kayed al-Qassimi, a member of the ruling family of the emirate of Ras al-Khaimah, Wam said.

Prominent human rights lawyers Mohamed al-Roken, the former head of the UAE Jurists’ Association Mohamed al-Mansoori, and Salem al-Shehhi received 10-year jail terms, Wam said.

Five defendants were jailed for seven years while eight tried in absentia were sentenced to 15 years, it said.

A total of 25 people were acquitted including all 13 women arrested in the crackdown and who had been on bail since the start of the trial on March 4.

Prosecutors say the accused are linked to the Al Islah group, which has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Amnesty’s Middle East and North Africa deputy director staunchly criticised the proceedings and the verdicts.

“Not only do the defendants appear to have been targeted simply because of their views, but they have been convicted on bogus charges and denied the basic right to a fair trial,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui.

The London-based watchdog pointed out that the convicted men have no right to appeal.

Their trial was the largest in the history of the UAE.

The defendants, among them lawyers, university professors and students, were arrested between March and December 2012 for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government.

Only selected relatives of the defendants, local journalists and representatives of human rights groups were allowed to attend the trial at the country’s top security court.

Several rights groups including the International Federation for Human Rights voiced concern that the only international legal observer mandated to attend the last session of the trial, Melanie Gingell, had been denied access to the hearing.

“This denial puts the UAE in breach of a UN General Assembly resolution adopted in 1999 requiring states to allow trial observations to monitor whether international standards of fair trials are adhered to,” said the groups in a statement.

They also urged the UAE to investigate the defendants’ torture allegations.

Human Rights Watch, Alkarama and Amnesty said last month they received 22 handwritten letters sent by some of the detainees citing “systematic mistreatment and torture”.

State media has repeatedly lashed out at foreign criticism of the trial.

A US State Department report in April said the UAE has significant human rights problems, including “arbitrary arrests, incommunicado detentions and lengthy pretrial detentions; limitations on citizens’ civil liberties... and citizens’ inability to change their government”.

The UAE dismissed the report as “unbalanced” and insisted that it was committed to bettering its rights record.

UAE attorney general Salem Kobaish in February said the defendants had set up a secret organisation “aimed at opposing the basic foundations on which the state’s political system is built and at seizing power” which had ties to individuals and organisations outside the UAE, including the Muslim Brotherhood.