There are no comments.
Agencies
New Delhi
The Supreme Court yesterday struck down a law giving Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government a bigger say in the appointment of top judges, calling the new system harmful to judicial independence in the world’s largest democracy.
The government reacted to the apex court’s decision by saying it had gone above the parliament and people’s will.
The top court has a history of judicial activism that can prove disconcerting for governments, who say courts often exceed their powers in announcing decisions.
The Supreme Court took the previous administration to task over issues such as corruption and human rights, for instance.
A new system introduced by Modi’s government last year included the federal law minister on a panel that appoints senior judges. The old system had vested those powers in a group of the country’s top judges.
“The court said it (the panel) will obstruct judicial independence that is the backbone of the constitution,” said Prashant Bhushan, one of the lawyers who challenged the new law.
Modi faced accusations of interfering with the judiciary after coming to power last year, when a candidate for a Supreme Court appointment accused the government of running a campaign to block it.
Critics say the government should have no role in selecting judges and the new panel could lead to politicisation of appointments, but the government says the old system needed to be revamped as it was not transparent.
Communications Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad defended the government’s action, saying several of India’s law commissions, charged with considering legal reform, had recommended changes to the old system, which had also worried some top judges.
“There was complete political unanimity,” Prasad, a former law minister, said yesterday, adding that the new panel had been formed after “deep consideration” over 20 years.
Some lawyers, however, say both the old and new systems of appointing judges are not ideal.
“A system of judges appointing themselves is imperfect,” said Karuna Nundy, a Supreme Court lawyer, who does not back the new system because she fears it gives the government the power to influence decisions.
“Let’s not forget that the government of India is the largest litigant before the courts,” she said.
Earlier, Law Minister Sadanand Gowda said he will go through the text in detail and consult Prime Minister Narendra Modi, legal experts and others.
The minister insisted that the act represented the will of the people as it was backed by all the members in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
There are no comments.
Saying goodbye is never easy, especially when you are saying farewell to those that have left a positive impression. That was the case earlier this month when Canada hosted Mexico in a friendly at BC Place stadium in Vancouver.
Some 60mn primary-school-age children have no access to formal education
Lekhwiya’s El Arabi scores the equaliser after Tresor is sent off; Tabata, al-Harazi score for QSL champions
The Yemeni Minister of Tourism, Dr Mohamed Abdul Majid Qubati, yesterday expressed hope that the 48-hour ceasefire in Yemen declared by the Command of Coalition Forces on Saturday will be maintained in order to lift the siege imposed on Taz City and ease the entry of humanitarian aid to the besieged
Some 200 teachers from schools across the country attended Qatar Museum’s (QM) first ever Teachers Council at the Museum of Islamic Art (MIA) yesterday.
The Supreme Judiciary Council (SJC) of Qatar and the Indonesian Supreme Court (SCI) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on judicial co-operation, it was announced yesterday.
Sri Lanka is keen on importing liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Qatar as part of government policy to shift to clean energy, Minister of City Planning and Water Supply Rauff Hakeem has said.