No sooner had the news been delivered than the conspiracy theories started. Tiger Woods, it was suggested, never had any intention of returning to competitive action either in California this week or Turkey next month; earlier assertions to the contrary had been linked to some wider commercial plan. The fact so much of Woods’s life is shrouded in deep secrecy only fuels such theories.
For once, this sceptical thought process does not actually make any sense. For all Woods may be fond of the dollar signs he can attach to his name, the scale of reputational damage attached to announcing a comeback after 15 months of on-course absence before stating he does not regard his golf as of sufficient standard to appear is huge.
Even the notion that he was paid a fee simply for stating he would feature in the Turkish Airlines Open does not come close to offsetting what happened next. For Woods, not least in terms of public perception, this is nothing other than a serious setback.
Had Woods pointed towards an issue with his back and, perhaps, the taking of added precautions upon medical advice as a reason to kick his return into the long grass, there would have been questions as to whether his fitness would ever be of a level where competing again is a reality. There would also have been widespread nods of understanding.
Instead Woods – he of 79 PGA Tour wins including 14 majors – highlighted a “vulnerable” golf game. The player once so unwilling to pinpoint personal weakness to the point where he may genuinely have thought himself infallible, is now telling the world that he would most likely embarrass himself in tournament play. A man who as recently as the 2013 Masters boasted about the ability to play an approach shot two yards differently to the one before is now conjuring visions of shanks and duffs.
If that seems an exaggeration, Woods’s second round of 82 at last year’s Phoenix Open is a decent reference point.
Two aspects of this scene are unique to Woods. Firstly, every shot of every tournament he played was scrutinised even before the injury and form woes which have ruined his last three years. When trying to recapture even some of his past greatness, the level of attention placed on him means errors will be amplified tenfold. The Catch 22 here is that the only way Woods can become competitive again is by sampling tournament golf.
The other pertinent aspect relates to this golfer’s character. Whereas others returning from multiple back surgeries might be content to float around the midriff of PGA Tour events, Woods’s ferocious competitive instinct could never legitimately be toned down. Turning up at any event with no aspiration whatsoever of winning, regardless of backdrop, would seem pointless. Aligning this lifelong approach with current circumstances represents a massive psychological challenge for him.
As Woods will know only too well, there cannot be continued comebacks. This, bluntly and whenever it arrives, will be his final tilt at adding to the roll of honour which established him as one of his sport’s all-time greats. For that reason, perhaps the erring on the side of caution is a sensible move. What cannot be understated, though, is how serious a predicament Woods remains in. His own terminology offers proof of that.